Showing posts with label google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label google. Show all posts

Monday, December 17, 2007

New Site Feed



You may have noticed that we've added automatically updating RSS feeds (what is RSS?) above and to the right column of the Greene Futures blog. The box at the top of this column is a widget which projects the articles we pick to share from our own Google Reader RSS subscriptions. With it, we will publish the most important and interesting pieces from our daily reading (encompassing 1000+ articles daily from 304 independent outlets, including news articles, blog posts, journal offerings, new books, and published reports). Greene Future's regular sources are listed to the bottom right-hand side of the blog. We spend hours every day combing through this mountain of information, running the gamut of world news, foreign affairs, trends, energy developments, scientific findings, technological innovations, environmental issues, business events and economic ramifications.

But for you, dear reader, we provide fertile seeds sorted from the chaff. Meaty, actionable intelligence wrestled from a tangle of information overload.

This is just one step in a series to make this site the most useful depot for its readers in all things related to future trends. There exists no satisfactory list of all the news outlets, futurist thinkers and analysis sources to date. It's a full-time job attempting to track down all the little bits of evidence from every corner of the information sphere, and an even more intimidating task groping toward some understanding of what it all means.

Please make sure and subscribe to the Greene Futures blog feed (click here to subscribe). It will allow you to automatically stay abreast of news, analysis and updates from Greene Futures through your favored RSS Reader (Google Reader, My Yahoo RSS, RSS Reader, etc.). And if you frankly have no idea what I've been talking about with all this RSS nonsense, check out the video below:

Thursday, December 6, 2007

The Future of Luxury



A house in Belgrave Square will soon go on sale for £90million (which is approximately $900 gazillion, for those of you following the plummeting US Dollar). But this doesn’t even set the record for London real estate. That honor goes to a Qatar sheik, who paid £100 million for a Hyde Park penthouse. Speaking of English real estate, the Beckhams have perhaps set the record for most expensive tree house, wrangling with local zoning authorities to get permission for their children to tromp about in a $187,000 lux-fort.

But don’t worry, you too can have a “luxury” tree fort, too (for $50,000 from Neiman Marcus), which brings us to our theme of the day: mass luxury. What does luxury mean in the 21st Century? When all the rest of us can feasibly afford bejeweled iPhones, snakeskin Razr mobiles, golden Zunes, and blingin’ MacBooks, what’s exclusive anymore? A MacLaren baby stroller? No way, every Volvo-driving mom in the suburbs has one of those. How about a bullet-proof baby stroller?


(Disclaimer: Don't worry, no babies are harmed in the recording of this YouTube video, but it is the most insane thing you've ever seen)

Even luxury objects themselves have taken on characteristics of popular culture, kitch and camp. Witness the $100,000 Pepsi can, glam Mr. Potato Head, diamond Christmas tree (Steven Quick jeweler will make you a gold one), and Big Boi's $50,000 diamond-set Nike Air Force Ones.



Spending even astronomical amounts of cash isn’t even any guarantee. Perhaps luxury is experiences? A $20 million vacation to space, anyone? Want even more cache? How about a $30 million trip to the moon, care of Google? Even the new owner of the record $7.3 million vintage Rolls-Royce can’t drive there.

But then again, any crass lout among the nouveaux (ultra) riche can buy their way into such upper-echelon markers. Last year, the number of world billionaires grew by 35 percent, and the number of world millionaire households grew 16 percent to 9.6 million. What’s an aspiring magnate to do when just everyone is eating Yves Saint Laurent designer caviar?

Perhaps material luxury is so 20th Century, to be left behind with all the other gauche manifestations of conspicuous consumption? The traditional luxury industry may just be terrible for the environment. Perhaps the new luxury is conspicuous giving? Is saving the planet the newest status symbol? Certainly if the organic ubiquity of Whole Foods, celebrities smugly wielding hybrid Priuses, and haut eco-couture are any indication, then new exclusivity is the vanguard of conscience. No one can cast you the evil eye when your millions are preserving delicate rainforest ecosystems.

Maybe the only true luxury anymore is attention. Unlike diamond Mr. Potato Heads and rocket flights to the moon, attention truly is limited by the number of eyes and ears to fall upon every one of us jockeying frantically for their favor. So, help me feel luxurious, dear reader, and read on!

-For another interesting meditation on the future of luxury, check out my colleague Eric Garland's newest cover story in The Futurist magazine, "The Experience Economy: The High Life of Tomorrow."